The Politically Incorrect Show - 19/07/2000
[Music - Die Fledermaus]
Good afternoon, KAYA ORAAAA & welcome to the Politically Incorrect Show on the free speech network, Radio Pacific, for Wednesday July 19, proudly sponsored by Neanderton Nicotine Ltd, the show that says bugger the politicians & bureaucrats & all the other bossyboot busybodies who try to run our lives with our money; that stands tall for free enterprise, achievement, profit & excellence against the state-worshippers in our midst; that stands above all for the most sacred thing in the universe, the liberty of the human individual.
[Music up, music down]
Last week, caller Tim from London asked me, if I had to make a choice - right-wing conservative or left-wing liberal - which would I opt for? This stopped me in my tracks, because I've never been able to think of a compelling reason to opt for either of them. It put me in mind of an article I wrote on this matter two years ago when I had a regular column in Craccum magazine. I called the article Right Plus Left = Wrong, &, by way of supplying Tim the detailed answer I withheld last week, I'd like to resurrect it as my editorial today:
Libertarians are often labelled "Right-wing." Some libertarians themselves accept the appellation "libertarian Right." I reject the term altogether. There are too many disagreements, fundamental & incidental, between libertarians & those on the Right of the conventional political spectrum for me to countenance using the same label, however it is qualified.
Right-wingers share with Left-wingers the premise that the individual's life belongs to society - as embodied by the state - whom it is his duty to serve. Contrast for example the Nazi slogan, "The public good before the private good" on the Right with that of Mao's cultural revolution, "Serve the people" on the Left and observe that there IS no contrast! All Rightists and Leftists in between these extremes share this premise. Libertarians, by (genuine) contrast take the view that an individual's life belongs to him, that he may live it as he chooses, and that his only obligation to others is to respect their right to do the same.
All other disagreements between the Right & libertarians flow from this basic one. Right-wingers traditionally support military conscription - if the state owns your life, after all, then it may legitimately force you to forfeit it. Libertarians say an army should consist of volunteers. The Right opposes voluntary euthanasia; libertarians say: it's your life, and you may end it when you choose to, with the voluntary assistance of another if that is your choice. The Right would criminalise homosexuals & prostitutes; libertarians oppose any legal restrictions on consensual adult sex. The Right (and, nowadays, the Politically Correct Left also) would censor the books you read & the films & videos you watch; libertarians say: what you read & watch is your affair (in the case of "snuff movies" and child porn, there are already, properly, laws against murder & the sexual exploitation of children). The Right - and much of the Left - opposes the legalisation of drugs; libertarians say: it's your body - what you put in it is over to you. The Right is often racist, embracing some variant of white or Aryan supremacism. The Nazis & The Ku Klux Klan come readily to mind, although it should be noted that the most conspicuous racism in New Zealand is exhibited by those who oppose immigration & foreign investment, who are characteristically on the Left. Libertarians are colour-blind, treating all people as sovereign individuals with the rights thereof. We favour open borders for people & money.
The Right is often anti-woman, believing that women are simply breeding/feeding machines who should be confined to the bedroom & the kitchen in biblical obedience. Libertarians say that female humans are sovereign just as males are, & if they want to pursue a professional career, that is their right.
Even when it comes to the area where the Right & libertarians do seem to have something in common - advocacy of a free market - we actually don't, because the Right simply does not mean it or practise it. The dominance of the "New Right" in New Zealand delivered, overall, the most controlled, regulated & highly-taxed economy we had ever had, with unprecedented power vested in one Kremlin-like central planner, Dr Brash. What the Right means by a free market is "crony capitalism" of the Asian type, where the government bestows favours on businesspeople who contribute to its coffers. Libertarians favour a genuine free market in which people freely exchange value for value without state-imposed taxes, subsidies, tariffs, duties, etc.. Such a free market already exists in the form of the "cash" or "underground" economy, estimated in New Zealand's case to be worth $11b. It is illustrative of my thesis today that the most Right-wing of our parties - ACT - wishes to sniff out & tax this genuinely free market, while we libertarians say: leave it alone, that's what the whole economy should be like!
Libertarians, in short, are right - but not Right.
If you enjoyed this, why not subscribe?