The Politically Incorrect Show - 24/04/2001
[Music - Die Fledermaus]
Good afternoon, Kaya Oraaa & welcome to the Politically Incorrect Show on the free speech network, Radio Pacific, for Tuesday April 24, proudly sponsored by Neanderton Nicotine Ltd., the show that says bugger the politicians & bureaucrats & all the other bossyboot busybodies who try to run our lives with our money; that stands tall for free enterprise, achievement, profit, & excellence, against the state-worshippers in our midst; that stands above all for the most sacred thing in the universe, the liberty of the human individual.
[Music up, music down!]
So the Listeria is having a go at me. The new issue of the print arm of the Alliance devotes a whole page to attacking me. As Mario Lanza said when accused of being an ego-maniac & a sex maniac, I'm flattered. Listeria journalists have worked assiduously over the years to see the current government ensconced in power. They're still sore over losing their state-mandated monopoly on the right to publish television programme schedules. They're never going to like me or my message, & I'd be worried if they did.
"Poor Lindsay Perigo," writes reviewer Diana Balham. "Once a respected TV journalist, he now spends weekdays stroking his right-wing Radio Pacific fan club & then barking at them when they disagree with him." Comrade Harry, my regular caller from Canterbury, is singled out for praise for accusing me of "rudeness," while his calls for Jews & homosexuals to be gassed are not deemed to be "rude" at all. As a communist, Harry is a good illustration of my oft-made point that there is little to distinguish the extreme Left from the extreme Right - or either of them from everybody in between. It's a point obviously lost on the Listeria's reviewer. Someone has suggested I do en editorial about fascism, to demonstrate how far removed it is from what I believe. Frankly, I'm tired of having to do this. The likes of Listeria journalists are too stupid to get it & too evil to want to try. I dealt with the conventional political spectrum a couple of years ago in Craccum magazine, in an article called Left Plus Right = Wrong. Here's what I said then, & I see no reason to alter it now:
Libertarians are often labelled "Right-wing." Some libertarians themselves accept the appellation "libertarian Right." I reject the term altogether. There are too many disagreements, fundamental & incidental, between libertarians & those on the Right of the conventional political spectrum for me to countenance using the same label, however it is qualified.
Right-wingers share with Left-wingers the premise that the individual's life belongs to society < as embodied by the state < whom it is his duty to serve. Contrast for example the Nazi slogan, "The public good before the private good" on the Right with that of Mao's cultural revolution, "Serve the people" on the Left and observe that there IS no contrast! All Rightists and Leftists in between these extremes share this premise. Libertarians, by (genuine) contrast take the view that an individual's life belongs to him, that he may live it as he chooses, and that his only obligation to others is to respect their right to do the same.
All other disagreements between the Right & libertarians flow from this basic one. Right-wingers traditionally support military conscription < if the state owns your life, after all, then it may legitimately force you to forfeit it. Libertarians say an army should consist of volunteers. The Right opposes voluntary euthanasia; libertarians say: it's your life, and you may end it when you choose to, with the voluntary assistance of another if that is your choice. The Right would criminalise homosexuals & prostitutes; libertarians oppose any legal restrictions on consensual adult sex. The Right (and, nowadays, the Politically Correct Left also) would censor the books you read & the films & videos you watch; libertarians say: what you read & watch is your affair (in the case of "snuff movies" and child porn, there are already, properly, laws against murder & the sexual exploitation of children). The Right < and much of the Left < opposes the legalisation of drugs; libertarians say: it's your body < what you put in it is over to you.
The Right is often racist, embracing some variant of white or Aryan supremacism. The Nazis & The Ku Klux Klan come readily to mind, although it should be noted that the most conspicuous racism in New Zealand is exhibited by those who oppose immigration & foreign investment, who are characteristically on the Left. Libertarians are colour-blind, treating all people as sovereign individuals with the rights thereof. We favour open borders for people & money.
The Right is often anti-woman, believing that women are simply breeding/feeding machines who should be confined to the bedroom & the kitchen in biblical obedience. Libertarians say that female humans are sovereign just as males are, & if they want to pursue a professional career, that is their right.
Even when it comes to the area where the Right & libertarians do seem to have something in common < advocacy of a free market < we actually don't, because the Right simply does not mean it or practise it. The dominance of the "New Right" in New Zealand has delivered, overall, the most controlled, regulated & highly-taxed economy we have ever had, with unprecedented power vested in one Kremlin-like central planner, Dr Brash. What the Right means by a free market is "crony capitalism" of the Asian type, where the government bestows favours on businesspeople who contribute to its coffers. Libertarians favour a genuine free market in which people freely exchange value for value without state-imposed taxes, subsidies, tariffs, duties, etc.. Such a free market already exists in the form of the "cash" or "underground" economy, estimated in New Zealand's case to be worth $11b. It is illustrative of my thesis today that the most Right-wing of our parties < ACT < wishes to sniff out & tax this genuinely free market, while we libertarians say: leave it alone, that's what the whole economy should be like!
Libertarians, in short, are right -- but not Right.
If you enjoyed this, why not subscribe?